How can we evaluate the positive impact that visionary people can have on science? Should we support funneling large amounts of money to big projects? Both questions arose when I watched Noah Hutton’s film, In Silico .* I invited several prominent scientists to comment on the film’s main topic, modeling the human brain, in a special collection for eNeuro . The film tells the 10-year journey beginning with Henry Markram’s 2009 TED talk (https://www.ted.com/talks/henry\_markram\_a\_brain\_in\_a\_supercomputer), where he announced that the brain could be modeled within 10 years in a supercomputer. The scientific initiative began in 2005 at École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne when Markram founded and directed the first scientific initiative toward his goal: the Blue Brain Project (https://www.epfl.ch/research/domains/bluebrain/). Then, in 2012, the European Union selected the Human Brain Project (https://www.humanbrainproject.eu/en/), also then led by Markram, as one of two flagship programs to be awarde...

The recent trend toward an industrialization of brain exploration and the technological prowess of artificial intelligence algorithms and high-performance computing has caught the imagination of the public. These impressive advances are fueling an uncontrolled societal hype, the more amplified, the more “Blue Sky” the claim is. Will we ever be able to simulate a brain in silico ? Will “it” (the digital avatar) be conscious? The Blue Brain Project (BBP) and the European flagship the Human Brain Project (HBP) have surfed on this wave for the past 10 years. Their already significant lifetimes now offer new case studies for neuroscience sociology and epistemology, as the projects mature. Their distinctive “Blue Sky” flavor has been a key feature in securing unprecedented funding (more than one billion Euros) mostly through supranational institutions. The longitudinal analysis of these ventures provides clues to how the neuromyth they propagate sells science, in a scientific world based on an economy of promises.

Psychosis disorder is a debilitating disorder characterized by multiple admissions to psychiatric care facilities, higher unemployment rates, and decreased life expectancy. All of which create a high burden on the patient, their family, and the healthcare system. Understanding the basic mechanisms of psychotic disorder is essential for early discovery and facilitating better care for those suffering from it (Correll et al., 2018). The dopamine hypothesis of schizophrenia (Howes et al., 2009) suggests that dysregulation in dopamine signaling is the main cause of psychosis. Consistent with this theory, the ventral-tegmental area (VTA) is a pivoting region in psychosis in both animals and humans (Modinos et al., 2015). Individuals suffering from psychosis have elevated dopaminergic activity in the VTA. Such dysregulations were also found in prodromal syndromes (before full-blown development of psychosis; Howes et al., 2009), suggesting a causal effect of …

About one year ago, I learnt of the existence of In Silico . It did not come as a surprise, as I had expected that toward the end of the Human Brain Project (HBP)’s 10-year funding period, there will be a rush of articles and generally increased media interest in covering the project’s progress, achievements, and failures, although In Silico is special, given its 10-year time frame. I joined the HBP in 2014 and lead today one of three science work packages. For this documentary, I expected to hear requests for interviews, but there was literally nothing of that sort. After I have finally watched In Silico , I understand why. The documentary is in fact not about HBP, despite claims to the contrary by a previous review (Abbott, 2020). In Silico director, Noah Hutton, rather focuses on his fascination with Henry Markram’s 10-year vision of building a brain from the bottom up, the Blue Brain Project (BBP). As will be described towards the end, the HBP follows a stringent and much broader concept of integrating...

Charismatic leaders play fascinating roles in society, for good and for ill. In the United States, we are aware of the power of Martin Luther King and John Lewis in the fight for equal rights, and every country will have its heroes in its struggles for freedom. And, we are equally aware of the impact of despots who have led to terrible miscarriages of justice. We are less accustomed to think of the roles of charismatic leaders in our scientific communities, as we prefer to believe that we all “follow the science” rather than the scientist! Nonetheless, my eyes were opened to the impact of personal charisma in science at the Society for Neuroscience Meeting in 1980. I was chatting with a very fine membrane biophysicist when Eric Kandel walked by and my colleague said, “Kandel is my hero.” I was surprised, as the work my friend did was detailed characterization of membrane currents, far from the grand sweep of Kandel’s work. And when I asked my friend why he revered Kandel, he said that he didn’t dare to dre...

Developmental epileptic encephalopathies (DEEs) are severe seizure disorders that occur in infants and young children, characterized by developmental delay, cognitive decline, and early mortality. Recent efforts have identified a wide variety of genetic variants that cause DEEs. Among these, variants in the DNM1 gene have emerged as definitive causes of DEEs, including infantile spasms and Lennox–Gastaut syndrome. A mouse model of Dnm1 -associated DEE, known as “Fitful” ( Dnm1Ftfl ), recapitulates key features of the disease, including spontaneous seizures, early lethality, and neuronal degeneration. Previous work showed that DNM1 is a key regulator of synaptic vesicle (SV) endocytosis and synaptic transmission and suggested that inhibitory neurotransmission may be more reliant on DNM1 function than excitatory transmission. The Dnm1Ftfl variant is thought to encode a dominant negative DNM1 protein; however, the effects of the Dnm1Ftfl variant on synaptic transmission are largely unknown. To understand thes...

We can focus visuospatial attention by covertly attending to relevant locations, moving our eyes, or both simultaneously. How does shifting versus holding covert attention during fixation compare with maintaining covert attention across saccades? We acquired human fMRI data during a combined saccade and covert attention task. On Eyes-fixed trials, participants either held attention at the same initial location (“hold attention”) or shifted attention to another location midway through the trial (“shift attention”). On Eyes-move trials, participants made a saccade midway through the trial, while maintaining attention in one of two reference frames: the “retinotopic attention” condition involved holding attention at a fixation-relative location but shifting to a different screen-centered location, whereas the “spatiotopic attention” condition involved holding attention on the same screen-centered location but shifting relative to fixation. We localized the brain network sensitive to attention shifts (shift > ...

Motor adaptation is commonly thought to be a trial-and-error process in which the accuracy of movement improves with repetition of behavior. We challenged this view by testing whether erroneous movements are necessary for motor adaptation. In the eye movement system, the association between movements and errors can be disentangled, since errors in the predicted stimulus trajectory can be perceived even without movements. We modified a smooth pursuit eye movement adaptation paradigm in which monkeys learn to make an eye movement that predicts an upcoming change in target direction. We trained the monkeys to fixate on a target while covertly, an additional target initially moved in one direction and then changed direction after 250 ms. The monkeys showed a learned response to infrequent probe trials in which they were instructed to follow the moving target. Additional experiments confirmed that probing learning or residual eye movements during fixation did not drive learning. These results show that motor ad...

For some individuals, social stress is a risk factor for psychiatric disorders characterized by adolescent onset, prefrontal cortex (PFC) dysfunction and cognitive impairments. Social stress may be particularly harmful during adolescence when dopamine (DA) axons are still growing to the PFC, rendering them sensitive to environmental influences. The guidance cue Netrin-1 and its receptor, DCC, coordinate to control mesocorticolimbic DA axon targeting and growth during this age. Here, we adapted the accelerated social defeat (AcSD) paradigm to expose male mice to social stress in either adolescence or adulthood and categorized them as “resilient” or “susceptible” based on social avoidance behavior. We examined whether stress would alter the expression of DCC and Netrin-1 in mesolimbic DA regions and would have enduring consequences on PFC DA connectivity and cognition. While in adolescence the majority of mice are resilient but exhibit risk-taking behavior, AcSD in adulthood leads to a majority of susceptibl...

The lateral orbitofrontal cortex (LOFC) is thought to encode information associated with consumption of rewarding substances and is essential for flexible decision-making. Indeed, firing patterns of LOFC neurons are modulated following changes in reward value associated with an action outcome relationship. Damage to the LOFC impairs behavioral flexibility in humans and is associated with suboptimal performance in reward devaluation protocols in rodents. As chronic intermittent ethanol (CIE) exposure also impairs OFC-dependent behaviors, we hypothesized that CIE exposure would alter LOFC neuronal activity during alcohol drinking, especially under conditions when the reward value of ethanol was modulated by aversive or appetitive tastants. To test this hypothesis, we monitored LOFC activity using GCaMP6f fiber photometry in mice receiving acute injections of ethanol and in those trained in operant ethanol self-administration. In naive mice, an acute injection of ethanol caused a dose-dependent decrease in th...